Programming Essays - How the object is dead?object | Programing Reference For .Net,Java,C

How the object is dead?

After an object is constructed, the system is constructed out after the structure and whether or not the compiler?

Today review of the C + + language, for a small procedure. Found a constructed object, the system will be in the VC6 Below call themselves such Analysis of the structure cold and heat, and in Dev-C + + (using gcc) Below will not call? Besides, if the object is to establish the guidelines, then the system will not call out its own structure function.

Code as follows:

# Include

Using namespace std;

Class Counter
(

Private:
Int elem;
Public:
Counter ();
Counter (int elem);
~ Counter ();
);

Static int counter;

Counter:: Counter ()
(
Elem = 0;
Counter + +;
Cout << "in Counter ()" < <Endl;
Cout << "counter =" <<endl;
)

Counter:: Counter (int arg)
(
Elem = arg;
Counter + +;
Cout << "in Counter (int)" <<endl
Cout << "counter =" <<endl;
)

Counter:: ~ Counter ()
(
Counter -;
Cout << "in ~ Counter ()"<< endl;
Cout << "counter =" <<endl;
)

Int main (int argc, char * argv [])
(
Counter c1;
Counter c2;
Counter c3;
Counter * cp = new Counter (10);
Cp-> ~ Counter ();

Return 0;
)

VC6 in the operating results are:

In Counter ()
Counter = 1
In Counter ()
Counter = 2
In Counter ()
Counter = 3
In Counter (int)
Counter = 4
In-Counter ()
Counter = 3
In-Counter ()
Counter = 2
In-Counter ()
Counter = 1
In-Counter ()
Counter = 0
Press any key to continue

In Dev-C + + types of results:

In Counter ()
Counter = 1
In Counter ()
Counter = 2
In Counter ()
Counter = 3
In Counter (int)
Counter = 4
In-Counter ()
Counter = 3
Press any key to continue..

=================================

Conclusion:

The destruction of objects in the stage, calling out whether the structure function at the compiler, rather than the language definition. Therefore, the actual programming, this is the object of the control of the life cycle is very practical.